Statement: "Traffic accidents increased last year."Inference:
Correct answer: A. Road conditions may have deteriorated, leading to more accidents
- A. Road conditions may have deteriorated, leading to more accidents
- B. Accidents are inevitable and occur regularly
- C. People have become more cautious and drive carefully
- D. There have been no significant changes in traffic patterns
Explanation
The correct inference is that road conditions may have worsened, leading to more accidents. This aligns with the statement that traffic accidents increased. Option A is correct because deteriorating road conditions can directly contribute to a rise in accidents. Option B is incorrect as it does not specifically infer anything from the given statement but rather makes a general observation. Option C is incorrect because if people were driving more carefully, it would likely result in fewer accidents. Option D is incorrect as it contradicts the fact that there was an increase in accidents, indicating that something did change.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?