Moderate

Argument: "Censorship is essential for national security."Which weakens it?

Correct answer: A. Censorship limits freedom

  • A. Censorship limits freedom
  • B. Governments protect citizens
  • C. Security matters
  • D. People obey laws

Explanation

The correct answer is Option A: Censorship limits freedom. This statement weakens the argument by highlighting a potential downside of censorship, which is the restriction of personal freedoms. If censorship limits freedom, it might not be justifiable even for national security, thus undermining the argument's claim. Option B, Governments protect citizens, supports the argument by suggesting that government actions, such as censorship, are protective measures. Option C, Security matters, aligns with the argument by emphasizing the importance of security. Option D, People obey laws, is irrelevant to the argument about the necessity of censorship for national security.

Last updated

About Critical Thinking

Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.

Practise Critical Thinking

361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

Related questions