Why has the neo-neo debate dominated international theory?
Correct answer: B. Because it represents a debate between paradigms that define an agenda for research, policymaking, the field of study
- A. The debate has not dominated international theory
- B. Because it represents a debate between paradigms that define an agenda for research, policymaking, the field of study
- C. Because academics want to keep the debate alive by inventing new theories
- D. None of the aboveRead Political News
Explanation
The neo-neo debate contrasts neorealism with neoliberal institutionalism, two major paradigms that shape research questions, theoretical agendas and policy discussions. Its influence comes from this broad agenda-setting role rather than from academics merely preserving an old debate.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Theories of International Relations
205 free Theories of International Relations MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Theories of International Relations questions
What are the main differences between 'offensive' and 'defensive' realists?
What are the core assumptions of neo-realists?
What is left out of the 'neo-neo' debate?
Why has it been a particularly American phenomenon?
Which of these is an example of a revolution, based on strong ideologies, that lost its ideological fervor?
Which of the following is true of theories that center on the individual level of analysis?