Argument: "People should eat less meat to fight climate change."Which weakens this?
Correct answer: B. Livestock farming has minimal impact on climate change compared to other industries
- A. Meat has nutritional value
- B. Livestock farming has minimal impact on climate change compared to other industries
- C. People enjoy barbecues
- D. Fruits are tasty
Explanation
The argument suggests that reducing meat consumption is necessary to combat climate change. The correct answer, Livestock farming has minimal impact on climate change compared to other industries, directly challenges this by arguing that the environmental impact of meat is not as significant as portrayed, thus weakening the argument. The other options do not directly relate to the environmental issue at hand. 'Meat has nutritional value' addresses health, not climate change. 'People enjoy barbecues' and 'Fruits are tasty' are about personal preferences and unrelated to environmental impact.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?