Argument: "History should be a compulsory subject."Which strengthens this?
Correct answer: A. History provides insights into cultural development and helps prevent past mistakes.
- A. History provides insights into cultural development and helps prevent past mistakes.
- B. Not everyone finds history interesting or relevant.
- C. Other subjects may require less memorization and analysis.
- D. History textbooks can be lengthy and detailed.
Explanation
The correct answer is that history provides insights into cultural development and helps prevent past mistakes. This answer strengthens the argument by illustrating the crucial role history plays in educating individuals about the evolution of societies and the importance of learning from past events. The other options either point out personal preferences or logistical concerns, which do not justify making history a mandatory subject.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?