Argument: "Art should be funded publicly."Which weakens it?

Correct answer: C. Funding public health is more urgent

  • A. Art is subjective
  • B. Some art offends people
  • C. Funding public health is more urgent
  • D. Art is everywhere

Explanation

The correct answer is Option C: Funding public health is more urgent. This statement suggests that there are more pressing needs for public funds, thereby weakening the argument that art should be funded publicly. Option A discusses the subjective nature of art, which does not directly undermine the argument for public funding. Option B addresses the controversial nature of some art but does not inherently argue against public funding. Option D suggests art's ubiquity, which does not counter the argument for public support.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Critical Thinking

Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.

Practise Critical Thinking

435 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Critical Thinking questions