Which sentence shows the most economical expression suitable for a précis?
Correct answer: B. Because there was no rain, crops failed
- A. Due to the fact that rainfall was absent, crops failed
- B. Because there was no rain, crops failed
- C. The crops, which were present in fields, failed due to rain absence
- D. It was a situation in which crops failed because rain was absent
Explanation
The second sentence expresses the complete relationship in the fewest clear words. The other versions use wordy phrases or awkward constructions that reduce concision.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? support@testustad.com
About Summarising and Precis
Summarising and précis writing reduce a passage to its essential ideas while preserving its meaning, sequence and tone. The work involves separating main points from examples, removing repetition and decoration, using concise original wording, maintaining grammatical unity and avoiding personal comments, distortion or unnecessary detail.
Practise Summarising and Precis
30 free Summarising and Precis MCQs from Business Writing and Comprehension, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Business Writing and Comprehension questions like this
Business Writing and Comprehension is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
More Summarising and Precis questions
If a passage uses several linking words to explain its reasoning, what should a précis retain?
When a précis includes information from the original passage, which form of attribution is generally safest?
Which method most effectively reduces the length of a passage without losing its central argument?
What is the proper treatment of a quotation that is central to a passage's argument?
A passage develops its position by presenting a problem, examining its causes, and proposing a remedy. Which order should a clear précis normally follow?
Which revision best removes redundancy from a précis?