When a précis includes information from the original passage, which form of attribution is generally safest?
Correct answer: A. The writer argues that the policy has limits
- A. The writer argues that the policy has limits
- B. I personally agree that the policy has limits
- C. The policy has limits beyond any doubt
- D. We should reject the policy immediately
Explanation
The first option attributes the claim to the original writer without adding personal judgement. The other options either insert the précis writer's view or present the claim with unjustified certainty.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? support@testustad.com
About Summarising and Precis
Summarising and précis writing reduce a passage to its essential ideas while preserving its meaning, sequence and tone. The work involves separating main points from examples, removing repetition and decoration, using concise original wording, maintaining grammatical unity and avoiding personal comments, distortion or unnecessary detail.
Practise Summarising and Precis
30 free Summarising and Precis MCQs from Business Writing and Comprehension, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Business Writing and Comprehension questions like this
Business Writing and Comprehension is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
More Summarising and Precis questions
Which method most effectively reduces the length of a passage without losing its central argument?
What should a writer do when the original passage contains an unsupported personal opinion?
Which statement best distinguishes a paraphrase from a précis?
If a passage uses several linking words to explain its reasoning, what should a précis retain?
Which sentence shows the most economical expression suitable for a précis?
What is the proper treatment of a quotation that is central to a passage's argument?