Which principle generally prevents a state from exercising its courts' jurisdiction over another sovereign state without an accepted exception?
Correct answer: A. State immunity
- A. State immunity
- B. Diplomatic protection
- C. Universal jurisdiction
- D. Active nationality
Explanation
State immunity reflects the equality and sovereignty of states and generally limits one state's courts from hearing cases against another state. Universal jurisdiction concerns certain offences and does not itself create immunity.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About International Law
International law regulates relations among states and other recognised international actors through treaties, customary practice and general legal principles. Coverage includes statehood and recognition, jurisdiction, diplomatic relations, state responsibility, territory, use of force, peaceful dispute settlement and the role of the United Nations, while distinguishing public international law from private international law.
Practise International Law
63 free International Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More International Law questions
What is the primary legal function of a treaty in international law?
Which of the following is not a traditional criterion of statehood under the Montevideo Convention?
Which remedy most directly seeks to restore the situation that existed before an internationally wrongful act?
A state prosecutes a foreign national for piracy committed outside its territory and without a direct connection to the state. Which jurisdictional basis is most relevant?
What does the principle of pacta sunt servanda require in treaty law?
Which circumstance generally excludes wrongfulness when a state lawfully consents to another state's specific conduct?