when considering the 'who is allowed to speak and with what kind of identity, authority and knowledge?' post-structuralists hold that:__________?
Correct answer: B. As a consequence of how world politics has been theorised by conventional approaches such as Realism, non-State groups such as NGOs cannot gain a voice in international relations.
- A. All groups, including NGOs, refugees and stateless individuals, have an equal voice in global affairs.
- B. As a consequence of how world politics has been theorised by conventional approaches such as Realism, non-State groups such as NGOs cannot gain a voice in international relations.
- C. Only states have the right to a voice in the international political realm.
- D. There is a hierarchy of those non-state actors that have a voice in international politics, with stateless people coming at the top of the hierarchy.Humanities
Explanation
Post-structuralists question whose knowledge is treated as authoritative and show how conventional state-centred theories marginalise NGOs, refugees and other non-state actors. Option b captures this critique, although its claim that such groups cannot gain a voice is stronger than the general argument.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Theories of International Relations
205 free Theories of International Relations MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Theories of International Relations questions
Why is the concept of 's*x trafficking' highlighted as of interest to post-structuralists?
According to the post-structuralist scholar R.B.J Walker the principle of State Sovereignty:
Who would realists suggest has a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force?
How do post-structuralists argue that humanitarian interventions have been legitimized?
Scholar David Campbell distinguishes between which of the following?
Which of the following is correct, as regards post-structuralists methodology?