How do post-structuralists argue that humanitarian interventions have been legitimized?
Correct answer: C. Through discourse in the international political arena that split the other into 'innocent civilians' and 'Balkan governments.'
- A. Through the UN sanctioning and taking full responsibility for humanitarian intervention.
- B. By parliamentary hearings that raise awareness and legitimacy of humanitarian intervention.
- C. Through discourse in the international political arena that split the other into 'innocent civilians' and 'Balkan governments.'
- D. All of the options given are correct.
Explanation
Post-structuralists argue that intervention is legitimised through discourse that represents some people as innocent victims and others, such as Balkan governments, as threatening or culpable. This framing makes intervention appear necessary and morally justified.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Theories of International Relations
205 free Theories of International Relations MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Theories of International Relations questions
when considering the 'who is allowed to speak and with what kind of identity, authority and knowledge?' post-structuralists hold that:__________?
Why is the concept of 's*x trafficking' highlighted as of interest to post-structuralists?
According to the post-structuralist scholar R.B.J Walker the principle of State Sovereignty:
Scholar David Campbell distinguishes between which of the following?
Which of the following is correct, as regards post-structuralists methodology?
Why is the term post-structuralism preferred by most scholars to post-modernism, with which it was often used interchangeably?