Statements: No car is bike. Some bikes are fast. Conclusions: I. Some fast things are not cars. II. Some fast things are bikes.

Correct answer: B. Both

  • A. Only II
  • B. Both
  • C. Only I
  • D. None

Explanation

The correct answer is 'Both.' Conclusion I is valid because if some bikes are fast and no car is a bike, then the fast bikes cannot be cars, meaning some fast things are not cars. Conclusion II is valid because it directly states that some fast things are bikes, supported by the statement 'Some bikes are fast.' Option A is incorrect because it disregards Conclusion I, which logically follows. Option C is incorrect because it disregards Conclusion II, which is directly supported by the statement. Option D is incorrect because both conclusions logically follow from the given statements.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Logical Deductions

Logical deductions require conclusions to be drawn from stated facts, conditions and relationships without adding outside information. The work includes handling all, some and none statements, necessary and sufficient conditions, ordering restrictions, true or false conclusions, and the difference between what must be true and what could be true.

Practise Logical Deductions

240 free Logical Deductions MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Logical Deductions questions