Statement: Should children be prevented completely from watching television? Arguments: (I) No. We get vital informafion regarding education through television.(II) Yes. It hampers the study of children.(III) Yes. Young children are misguided by certain programmes featuring violence.

Explanation

The correct answer is: Only I and III are strong (I) No. We get vital information regarding education through television: This argument is strong because television can be a valuable source of educational content, documentaries, news, and programs that can enrich a child's knowledge and understanding of the world. Banning children completely from watching television would deprive them of educational opportunities that can complement their learning. (II) Yes. It hampers the study of children: This argument is not strong. While excessive television watching can indeed interfere with a child's study and academic performance, it doesn't necessarily mean that children should be completely prevented from watching television. The key is to find a balance between recreational screen time and study time, rather than a complete ban. (III) Yes. Young children are misguided by certain programs featuring violence: This argument is strong. Young children are impressionable, and exposure to violent or inappropriate content on television can negatively influence their behavior and attitudes. Parents and caregivers should be cautious about the programs children watch and consider age-appropriate content to ensure their mental and emotional well-being. In conclusion, arguments I and III are strong, while argument II is not as strong. Therefore, the correct answer is: Only I and III are strong.