Argument: "Video games improve problem-solving skills."Which supports this?
Correct answer: A. A: Games involve strategic thinking and decision-making
- A. A: Games involve strategic thinking and decision-making
- B. B: Video games are primarily designed for entertainment
- C. C: The cost of gaming consoles is high
- D. D: High scores indicate player proficiency
Explanation
The correct answer is A: 'Games involve strategic thinking and decision-making.' Many video games are designed to challenge players with puzzles, strategic planning, and decision-making tasks that can enhance their problem-solving abilities. Option B merely states the entertainment purpose of games, which doesn't support the argument about skill improvement. Option C discusses console costs, which is unrelated to the skills developed through gaming. Option D mentions high scores, which may show game proficiency but don't necessarily equate to improved problem-solving skills.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?