Argument: "The government should ban advertising to children."Which strengthens the argument?
Correct answer: A. Children are easily influenced by advertising, impacting their preferences and behaviors.
- A. Children are easily influenced by advertising, impacting their preferences and behaviors.
- B. Ads are expensive for companies to produce and broadcast.
- C. Some parents appreciate advertisements for providing information on new products.
- D. Kids have a sophisticated understanding of marketing tactics.
Explanation
The correct answer is that children are easily influenced by advertising, which supports the argument that advertising to them should be banned. This is because children may not have the critical thinking skills to understand the persuasive intent of advertisements, making them more susceptible to influence. The other options do not strengthen the argument: the cost of ads is irrelevant to the impact on children, parental appreciation of ads contradicts the need for a ban, and suggesting that kids understand marketing undermines the rationale for protection.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?