Argument: "Banning sugary drinks will lower obesity."Which weakens this?
Correct answer: A. People might consume sugar from other sources, such as food or different beverages.
- A. People might consume sugar from other sources, such as food or different beverages.
- B. Children have a strong preference for soda, which could lead them to find ways to access it despite a ban.
- C. The appealing taste of sugar could drive people to seek it out in forms other than drinks.
- D. Imposing bans reduces consumer choices, leading to potential backlash or non-compliance.
Explanation
The correct answer is Option A. The argument assumes that banning sugary drinks will directly lead to lower obesity. However, if people continue to consume sugar from other sources, the overall sugar intake might not decrease, thus weakening the argument. Option B suggests a challenge in enforcement but doesn't address overall sugar consumption. Option C notes the appeal of sugar but doesn't connect it to obesity rates directly. Option D discusses the implications of bans but not their effect on obesity.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?