Argument: "Students who take extra classes score higher, so extra classes cause higher scores." The main weakness of this argument is that it

Correct answer: B. confuses correlation with causation, ignoring that motivated students may both take extra classes and study more

  • A. uses too small a sample
  • B. confuses correlation with causation, ignoring that motivated students may both take extra classes and study more
  • C. relies on an outdated study
  • D. contradicts itself

Explanation

Two things occurring together does not establish that one produces the other, since a third factor such as motivation could produce both. Ruling this out would need a comparison of similar students assigned to classes or not. Correlation and causation is the most heavily tested flaw in critical reasoning sections.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? support@testustad.com

About Critical Thinking

Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.

Practise Critical Thinking

435 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Critical Thinking questions