Argument: "All students should take a philosophy course."Which supports this?
Correct answer: A. Philosophy enhances critical thinking skills
- A. Philosophy enhances critical thinking skills
- B. Philosophers are traditionally older individuals
- C. Students enjoy participating in debates
- D. Philosophy courses are generally considered easy
Explanation
The correct answer is Option A: 'Philosophy enhances critical thinking skills.' Philosophy is known for developing a student's ability to think critically, analyze arguments, and reason logically, which are valuable skills in any field of study or career. Option B is incorrect as the age of philosophers is not related to the benefits of taking philosophy courses. Option C is incorrect because, while debates may be part of the curriculum, enjoying debates doesn't directly support the argument's educational rationale. Option D is incorrect because the perceived difficulty of a subject does not address the argument's focus on educational benefits.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?