All pharmacists are trained. Nadia is a pharmacist. Which conclusion must follow?
Correct answer: A. Nadia is trained.
- A. Nadia is trained.
- B. Nadia is a doctor.
- C. All trained people are pharmacists.
- D. No pharmacist is trained.
Explanation
Nadia belongs to the group of pharmacists. Since every pharmacist is trained, Nadia must be trained.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? support@testustad.com
About Logical Deductions
Logical deductions require conclusions to be drawn from stated facts, conditions and relationships without adding outside information. The work includes handling all, some and none statements, necessary and sufficient conditions, ordering restrictions, true or false conclusions, and the difference between what must be true and what could be true.
Practise Logical Deductions
240 free Logical Deductions MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Logical Deductions questions
Ali is taller than Bilal. Bilal is taller than Hamza. Which conclusion must follow?
Statements: All coins are round. All rounds are shapes. Conclusions: I. All coins are shapes. II. Some shapes are coins
Statements: Some bats are balls. All balls are round. Conclusions: I. Some bats are round. II. All bats are round.
M is before N in a queue. P is after N. Which conclusion must follow?
All poets are thoughtful. Some teachers are poets. Which conclusion must follow?
All pilots are licensed. No licensed person is careless. Ahmed is a pilot. Which conclusion must follow?