Why are game-theoretic approaches so suited to 'neo-neo' work?
Correct answer: C. Because this approach allows an analysis of relative and absolute gains, which is a central point of the 'neo-neo' debate
- A. Because game-theoretic approaches are easier to understand
- B. Game-theoretic approaches are not suited to realist work
- C. Because this approach allows an analysis of relative and absolute gains, which is a central point of the 'neo-neo' debate
- D. None of the above
Explanation
Game theory suits the neo-neo debate because it models strategic cooperation and conflict while distinguishing absolute gains, emphasized by neoliberals, from relative gains, emphasized by neorealists. The gains question is central to their disagreement.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Theories of International Relations
205 free Theories of International Relations MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.