Which statement best describes the idea of distributive justice?
Correct answer: A. It allocates benefits and burdens within society
- A. It allocates benefits and burdens within society
- B. It corrects a private wrong between two parties
- C. It determines whether a court has jurisdiction
- D. It enforces promises through specific performance
Explanation
Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of resources, opportunities, benefits and burdens among members of a community. Corrective justice, by contrast, focuses on repairing a wrong between particular parties.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose and sources of law through the ideas of justice, rights, duties, sovereignty, liability and legal personality. It compares natural law, analytical positivism, historical, sociological and realist approaches, and considers how courts interpret legal rules, distinguish law from morality and resolve conflicts between competing principles.
Practise Jurisprudence
70 free Jurisprudence MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Jurisprudence questions
What is the principle of stare decisis primarily concerned with?
Which approach to statutory interpretation gives significant weight to the purpose that the legislation seeks to achieve?
What distinguishes strict liability from fault-based liability?
A duty in rem is generally owed to whom?
According to Thomas Aquinas, what is natural law?
Which feature belongs to Lon L. Fuller's internal morality of law?