What distinguishes strict liability from fault-based liability?

Correct answer: B. Strict liability may arise without proving negligence or intention

  • A. Strict liability requires proof of intention in every case
  • B. Strict liability may arise without proving negligence or intention
  • C. Strict liability applies only to breaches of contract
  • D. Strict liability removes every available legal defence

Explanation

Strict liability can impose responsibility even when the claimant does not prove negligence or intention. It does not necessarily eliminate every defence, and it is not confined to contractual disputes.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Jurisprudence

Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose and sources of law through the ideas of justice, rights, duties, sovereignty, liability and legal personality. It compares natural law, analytical positivism, historical, sociological and realist approaches, and considers how courts interpret legal rules, distinguish law from morality and resolve conflicts between competing principles.

Practise Jurisprudence

70 free Jurisprudence MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this

Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Jurisprudence questions