What distinguishes strict liability from fault-based liability?
Correct answer: B. Strict liability may arise without proving negligence or intention
- A. Strict liability requires proof of intention in every case
- B. Strict liability may arise without proving negligence or intention
- C. Strict liability applies only to breaches of contract
- D. Strict liability removes every available legal defence
Explanation
Strict liability can impose responsibility even when the claimant does not prove negligence or intention. It does not necessarily eliminate every defence, and it is not confined to contractual disputes.
Last updated
About Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose and sources of law through the ideas of justice, rights, duties, sovereignty, liability and legal personality. It compares natural law, analytical positivism, historical, sociological and realist approaches, and considers how courts interpret legal rules, distinguish law from morality and resolve conflicts between competing principles.
Practise Jurisprudence
60 free Jurisprudence MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.