Which of the following is NOT the case in terms of serial and parallel processing models?

Correct answer: D. According to the parallel processing model, the fact that there are cones and rods in the retina is evidence for multiple mechanisms that extract information in series from the retinal image

  • A. The serial processing model is now known to be inadequate, or at least incomplete
  • B. The serial model has been replaced, at or at least modified, firstly by the parallel processing model and then, most recently, by the recurrent processing model
  • C. According to the parallel processing model, analysis of different stimulus attributes, such as identity and location, proceeds simultaneously along different pathways, even from the earliest stages
  • D. According to the parallel processing model, the fact that there are cones and rods in the retina is evidence for multiple mechanisms that extract information in series from the retinal image

Explanation

Rods and cones provide different parallel mechanisms for analysing retinal information, not mechanisms that extract information in series. Thus statement d does not describe the parallel processing model, whereas the other statements do.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

Practise Cognitive Psychology

552 free Cognitive Psychology MCQs from Psychology, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Psychology questions like this

Psychology is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.

More Cognitive Psychology questions