Which of the following is not a project factor that should be considered when planning the structure of software engineering teams ?
Correct answer: C. The degree of sociability required for the project
- A. The difficulty of the problem to be solved
- B. High frustration caused by personal, business, or technological factors that causes friction among team members
- C. The degree of sociability required for the project
- D. The rigidity of the delivery date
Explanation
The degree of sociability required is not a standard project factor used to plan software team structure. Problem difficulty, interpersonal friction, and delivery-date rigidity can directly influence the appropriate team organization.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Software Project Management
171 free Software Project Management MCQs from Software Engineering, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Software Engineering questions like this
Software Engineering is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
More Software Project Management questions
Which of the following is an activity that distributes estimated effort across the planned project duration by allocating the effort to specific software engineering tasks ?
SPMP stands for__________________?
Which software engineering team has no permanent leader ?
Which type of software engineering team has a defined leader who coordinates specific tasks and secondary leaders that have responsibility for sub tasks ?
Who interacts with the software once it is released for production use ?
Which of the following paradigm attempts to structure a team in a manner that achieves some of the controls associated with the closed paradigm but also much of the innovation that occurs when using the random paradigm ?