What is the general rule concerning a state's jurisdiction over its nationals for conduct occurring abroad?
Correct answer: C. A state may generally regulate its nationals subject to applicable international limits
- A. Only the territorial state may ever exercise jurisdiction
- B. A state can never regulate conduct outside its territory
- C. A state may generally regulate its nationals subject to applicable international limits
- D. Nationality has no connection with jurisdiction under international law
Explanation
The nationality principle can support a state's jurisdiction over its nationals even when conduct occurs abroad, subject to international law and conflicts with other jurisdictions. It is therefore broader than purely territorial jurisdiction but is not unlimited.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About International Law
International law regulates relations among states and other recognised international actors through treaties, customary practice and general legal principles. Coverage includes statehood and recognition, jurisdiction, diplomatic relations, state responsibility, territory, use of force, peaceful dispute settlement and the role of the United Nations, while distinguishing public international law from private international law.
Practise International Law
63 free International Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More International Law questions
Which statement best describes negotiation as a peaceful method of settling an international dispute?
What is the legal effect of a final judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case between the parties?
What is the usual legal effect of a belligerent occupation of foreign territory?
Under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, what is meant by general principles of law?
Which jurisdictional principle allows a state to regulate conduct occurring within its own territory?
What is the normal legal position concerning entry by the receiving state's authorities into diplomatic premises?