What does the ejusdem generis rule of interpretation generally require?
Correct answer: A. General words following specific words are limited to the same class
- A. General words following specific words are limited to the same class
- B. Every statutory word must receive its ordinary dictionary meaning
- C. A statute must be interpreted to avoid every possible injustice
- D. Earlier judicial decisions must always control later decisions
Explanation
Ejusdem generis means of the same kind or class. When specific terms are followed by general terms, the general terms are normally read as referring to items belonging to the specific class, unless the statute indicates otherwise.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose and sources of law through the ideas of justice, rights, duties, sovereignty, liability and legal personality. It compares natural law, analytical positivism, historical, sociological and realist approaches, and considers how courts interpret legal rules, distinguish law from morality and resolve conflicts between competing principles.
Practise Jurisprudence
70 free Jurisprudence MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Jurisprudence questions
Which statement best describes legislation as a formal source of law?
What is vicarious liability?
What is meant by legal personality in jurisprudence?
Which statement best distinguishes a legal duty from a moral duty?
In jurisprudence, what is the main idea behind formal justice?
Which statement best describes a persuasive precedent?