Under the doctrine of lis pendens, a transfer of immovable property during pending litigation is generally:
Correct answer: A. Subject to the result of the pending litigation
- A. Subject to the result of the pending litigation
- B. Automatically void for every legal purpose
- C. Conclusive proof of the buyer's title
- D. Effective only after criminal approval
Explanation
The doctrine protects the court's ability to make its decree effective by subjecting the transfer to the result of the pending case. It does not ordinarily make every transfer during litigation automatically void.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Civil Law
Civil law governs disputes involving private rights, including contracts, property, family relations, torts and compensation. The subject explains breach of duty, civil liability, damages, specific relief, injunctions and other remedies, while distinguishing private claims between individuals from criminal proceedings brought to punish offences against the state.
Practise Civil Law
912 free Civil Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Civil Law questions
An interpleader suit is generally filed by a person who:
Contributory negligence by a claimant generally has what effect on a civil claim for damages?
The doctrine of mitigation of damages generally requires an injured party to:
A cause of action in a civil suit consists of the material facts that:
Unjust enrichment generally requires a person who has received a benefit to:
A public nuisance is most accurately described as an unlawful interference with: