Suggestions for revising forest Act 1927 and forest policy are:
Correct answer: E. All of the above
- A. Punishment for the wood damage should be revised
- B. Undue political involvement should be stopped
- C. Organizational set up of the forest department must be strong and broad based
- D. Agroforestry practices should be increased in irrigated plantations
- E. All of the above
Explanation
Effective reform requires stronger penalties for forest damage, reduced political interference, a capable forest department and wider agroforestry adoption in irrigated plantations. These are complementary reforms, making option e the best choice.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Forest Policy and Law
67 free Forest Policy and Law MCQs from Forestry, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Forestry questions like this
Forestry is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
More Forest Policy and Law questions
Hazara Forest Act ________.
The important Sections of Forest Act 1927 are:
What are the objective and necessity of a separate and special forest law?
Forest policies in the past were meant to promote forestry and improve rangelands; watersheds, research and education were ineffective due to the main reasons:
The most important issues that affect forest policy at the national level are:
Future strategies to promote forestry are: