Suggestions for revising forest Act 1927 and forest policy are:
Correct answer: E. All of the above
- A. Punishment for the wood damage should be revised
- B. Undue political involvement should be stopped
- C. Organizational set up of the forest department must be strong and broad based
- D. Agroforestry practices should be increased in irrigated plantations
- E. All of the above
Explanation
Effective reform requires stronger penalties for forest damage, reduced political interference, a capable forest department and wider agroforestry adoption in irrigated plantations. These are complementary reforms, making option e the best choice.
Last updated
Practise Forest Policy and Law
67 free Forest Policy and Law MCQs from Forestry, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Forestry questions like this
Forestry is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
Related questions
Transboundary pollution is:
The Forest Act of 1927 needs to be reversed again to bring it in consonance with the modern day requirements of protecting preserving and expanding the country's meager forest resources and the attended benefits such as:
The North-West Frontier Province Wildlife (Protection, Preservation and Management) Ordinance, ________.
The Punjab Wildlife (Protection, Management) Act, _______.
The West Pakistan Fisheries Ordinance, ______ (Ordinance No. XXX of 1961):