Forest policies in the past were meant to promote forestry and improve rangelands; watersheds, research and education were ineffective due to the main reasons:
Correct answer: C. Both (a) & (b)
- A. No proper mechanism existed for implementing policy directives
- B. Provinces felt no follow to comply with national policies because forestry is a provincial responsibility
- C. Both (a) & (b)
- D. None of these
Explanation
Policies failed both because there was no effective mechanism to implement their directives and because provinces were not compelled to follow national policies in a mainly provincial subject. Therefore, both statements are relevant and option c is correct.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Forest Policy and Law
67 free Forest Policy and Law MCQs from Forestry, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Forestry questions like this
Forestry is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.
More Forest Policy and Law questions
Suggestions for revising forest Act 1927 and forest policy are:
Hazara Forest Act ________.
The important Sections of Forest Act 1927 are:
The most important issues that affect forest policy at the national level are:
Future strategies to promote forestry are:
Introduce new provincial legislation to need for: