Statements: Some animals are tigers. No tiger is lazy. Conclusions: I. No animal is lazy. II. Some animals are not lazy

Correct answer: A. Only II

  • A. Only II
  • B. Only I
  • C. Both
  • D. None

Explanation

To determine the validity of the conclusions, consider each statement logically. The first statement, 'Some animals are tigers,' means there is an overlap between animals and tigers. The second statement, 'No tiger is lazy,' means there is no overlap between tigers and lazy beings. Conclusion I, 'No animal is lazy,' cannot be drawn because animals outside the subset of tigers can still be lazy. However, Conclusion II, 'Some animals are not lazy,' follows because the subset of animals that are tigers cannot be lazy. Therefore, only Conclusion II is correct.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Logical Deductions

Logical deductions require conclusions to be drawn from stated facts, conditions and relationships without adding outside information. The work includes handling all, some and none statements, necessary and sufficient conditions, ordering restrictions, true or false conclusions, and the difference between what must be true and what could be true.

Practise Logical Deductions

240 free Logical Deductions MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Logical Deductions questions