Moderate

Statements: No fish can fly. All sharks are fish. Which conclusion follows?

Correct answer: B. No shark can fly

  • A. Some sharks can fly
  • B. No shark can fly
  • C. All flying things are fish
  • D. Some fish are sharks only

Explanation

Sharks lie entirely within fish, and fish are entirely excluded from the flying category, so sharks are excluded too. This is the valid form no A is B, all C are A, therefore no C is B. The exclusion passes down to every subset.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? support@testustad.com

About Syllogisms

Syllogisms use categorical statements such as all, some and no to establish relationships between groups. Questions require checking whether conclusions necessarily follow from the premises, often by mental set relationships or Venn diagrams, and distinguishing valid deductions from conclusions that are merely possible.

Practise Syllogisms

40 free Syllogisms MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Syllogisms questions