Statements: No cities are countries. No countries are villages. Conclusions: (I) Some countries are cities.(II) No villages are the city.
Correct answer: D. Both of the conclusions do not follow
- A. Only conclusion (I) follows
- B. Only conclusion (II) follows
- C. Both conclusions follow
- D. Both of the conclusions do not follow
Explanation
The least possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows, Conclusion:(i)Some countries are city - It is not possible,hence false.(ii)No villages are city - It is possible but not definite,hence false.Hence,neither conclusion (i) nor conclusion (ii) follows.
Last updated
About Syllogisms
Syllogisms use categorical statements such as all, some and no to establish relationships between groups. Questions require checking whether conclusions necessarily follow from the premises, often by mental set relationships or Venn diagrams, and distinguishing valid deductions from conclusions that are merely possible.
Practise Syllogisms
40 free Syllogisms MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
All children are silly people. Some silly people are rich people. All rich people are big shots. Which of the following conclusions are NECESSARILY TRUE?CONCLUSIONS:I. Some silly people are children.II. Some rich people are children.III. Some silly people are big shots.
All daffodils are plants. All plants are living things. Some living things are real. Conclusions: I. All daffodils are living things. II. Some living things are flowers. III. All daffodils are real. Which conclusions follow?
All hammers are tools. Some tools are useless things. All useless things are trash. Which of the following is NECESSARILY TRUE given only the information above?ConclusionsI. Some hammers are trash. II. Some tools are trash.III. All useless things are tools.
If all surgeons are doctors and some doctors are researchers, which conclusion definitely follows?
In syllogistic reasoning, a conclusion containing the word all can follow only if