Statement: "Either we cut the budget or the project fails." This reasoning may be flawed because it
Correct answer: A. presents a false dilemma, ignoring other possible options such as raising funds
- A. presents a false dilemma, ignoring other possible options such as raising funds
- B. uses emotional language
- C. appeals to authority
- D. repeats itself
Explanation
A false dilemma presents two alternatives as though they were the only ones available, when in reality further options exist, such as extra funding, a revised timeline or a reduced scope. Recognising the unstated third possibility is the standard response. The flaw is also called the either or fallacy.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? support@testustad.com
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
435 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Critical Thinking questions
Identify the assumption: "We should build a new hospital because the population of the district has doubled."
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the claim that a city's new bus lanes reduced traffic congestion?
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that a new drug is effective because patients improved after taking it?
"Professor Khan says the treatment works, and he is a famous surgeon, so it must work." This argument relies on
"You cannot trust his views on pollution because he drives a large car." This is an example of
"This medicine is safe because it is natural." The flaw in this argument is that it