Requirement of macronutrient per acre of the land is
Correct answer: D. 30 - 400 kg
- A. 5 - 200 kg
- B. 20-200 kg
- C. 200 - 400 kg
- D. 30 - 400 kg
Explanation
is indeed correct, although the lower end of the range seems exceptionally low for most agricultural scenarios and would likely be an outlier rather than the norm. Let's reconsider why option (a) might be correct:5 kg: While 5 kg per acre seems very low, it's not entirely implausible, especially for crops with very low nutrient requirements or in situations where soil fertility is exceptionally high.200 kg: On the other hand, 200 kg per acre represents a more typical upper limit of macronutrient requirements, especially for high-yield crops or intensive farming practices.Now we'll look at why other options are incorrect.The correct answer is (d) carbon.Explanation:(b) 20 - 200 kg:The lower limit of 20 kg per acre is more in line with typical agricultural practices compared to option (a)'s 5 kg. However, it might still be too low for many crops and situations, especially those aiming for higher yields or grown in soils with lower inherent fertility. Therefore, while the upper limit of 200 kg is reasonable, the lower limit might not adequately represent the lowest end of the macronutrient requirement spectrum.(c) 200 - 400 kg:While the upper limit of 400 kg per acre might be justified in certain intensive farming systems or in cases of severe soil nutrient depletion, it's generally considered excessive for typical agricultural scenarios. This range implies very high macronutrient requirements, which would be unsustainable in terms of cost, environmental impact, and potential nutrient runoff. Therefore, option (c) is incorrect as it overestimates the typical macronutrient requirements per acre.(d) 30 - 400 kg:Similar to option (c), the upper limit of 400 kg per acre is likely too high for most agricultural situations and could lead to issues like nutrient runoff, environmental degradation, and economic inefficiency. While the lower limit of 30 kg per acre is more reasonable compared to option (a)'s 5 kg, it still might not adequately represent the lowest end of the macronutrient requirement spectrum.(Environmental chemistry,Components of Environment)
Last updated