Read the following statements and decide about the arguments.Statement: Does Pakistan need so many plans for development?Arguments:_ I. Yes. Nothing can be achieved without proper planning.II. No. Too much time, money and energy is wasted on planning.
Correct answer: A. Only I is true
- A. Only I is true
- B. Only II is true
- C. Either I or II is true
- D. Neither I nor II is true
Explanation
Argument I states that proper planning is essential for achieving development objectives, which is a strong argument. It highlights the necessity of having a clear direction and allocation of resources, which is fundamental in any development program. On the other hand, argument II suggests that planning is a waste of resources, which is a flawed perspective. Effective planning not only helps in utilizing resources efficiently but also guides the implementation process. Therefore, the correct answer is that only argument I is valid. The other options are incorrect as they either misinterpret the necessity of planning or disregard the validity of argument I.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?