In a zero-sum game,
Correct answer: A. there is no point in communication or cooperation between the players because their interests are diametrically opposed
- A. there is no point in communication or cooperation between the players because their interests are diametrically opposed
- B. communication between players is rare because their interests are already in sync
- C. there is no point in communication or cooperation between the players because their interests are already in sync
- D. coordination of moves can maximize the total payoff to the players
Explanation
In a zero-sum game, one player's gain equals another's loss, so the players have directly opposed interests and cannot increase their combined payoff through cooperation. Coordination may still have tactical value, but option d describes a non-zero-sum situation.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Theories of International Relations
205 free Theories of International Relations MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Theories of International Relations questions
How is "the national interest" defined/determined by Realists?
What is the Realist image of the state?
What is the "ethic of responsibility" and how does it relate to world politics?
The Munich Agreement of 1938 with Adolph Hitler is synonymous with:
What do realists see as the most important element of national power in the short term?
Which of these is generally the most fungible of capabilities?