Experiment: To examine nutrient transport, a dye was introduced into the roots of two identical plants. One was placed in cold conditions; the other at room temperature.Observation: Dye reached leaves faster in the room temperature plant.Question: What conclusion is best supported?

Correct answer: C. Low temperature slows down active transport in plants.

  • A. Transport is faster in cold due to viscosity.
  • B. Dye movement is unaffected by temperature.
  • C. Low temperature slows down active transport in plants.
  • D. Cold enhances capillary action.

Explanation

The correct answer is that low temperature slows down active transport in plants, as evidenced by the dye reaching leaves faster in the room temperature plant. Option A is incorrect because viscosity would not lead to faster transport in cold conditions. Option B is incorrect as temperature clearly affected dye movement. Option D is incorrect as capillary action is not the primary mechanism at play in this experiment.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? support@testustad.com

About Scientific Reasoning

Scientific reasoning evaluates hypotheses through observations, variables, controls, measurements and experimental results. Questions involve identifying independent and dependent variables, recognising a fair test, interpreting tables or graphs, distinguishing evidence from opinion, and deciding whether data supports, rejects or leaves a hypothesis unresolved.

Practise Scientific Reasoning

334 free Scientific Reasoning MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Scientific Reasoning questions

Experiment: During a field study, frogs were exposed to simulated rainfall containing varying pH levels (neutral to acidic). Skin permeability and behavior were monitored.Observation: Frogs in acidic water showed stress behaviors and disrupted ion balance in skin cells.Question: What does the experiment support?

Experiment: Chick embryos were incubated in sealed containers with varied oxygen levels (5%, 15%, 21%). Their growth was monitored for a week.Observation: Embryos in 21% oxygen developed normally, those in 5% showed poor growth and deformities.Question: What conclusion can be made?

Experiment: Mature red blood cells and white blood cells were placed in a hypotonic solution, and their structural integrity was observed over time.Observation: Red blood cells swelled and burst quickly, while white blood cells remained intact for a longer time.Question: What explains the observed difference?

Experiment: Two fish species were kept in water with rising CO₂ levels. Their gill movement and blood pH were measured.Observation: Fish A maintained blood pH better and showed slower breathing changes than Fish B.Question: What can be inferred?

Experiment: To test the role of sunlight in vitamin D synthesis, mice were divided into two groups: one exposed to sunlight, the other kept in the dark.Observation: Only the sun-exposed group had detectable vitamin D levels after 10 days.Question: What conclusion is valid?

Experiment: Leaves of a plant were coated with wax to block stomatal openings. The rate of CO₂ intake was measured under light.Observation: CO₂ intake dropped drastically in wax-covered leaves.Question: What does this result indicate?