Experiment: In a classroom experiment, crushed liver (source of catalase) was placed in hydrogen peroxide solutions of different concentrations.Observation: Bubbles formed rapidly at 3% concentration, less at 1%, and very little at 0.2%.Question: What conclusion follows?

Correct answer: B. Catalase activity increases with substrate concentration up to a point.

  • A. Hydrogen peroxide inhibits catalase at all levels.
  • B. Catalase activity increases with substrate concentration up to a point.
  • C. Liver tissue does not affect bubble formation.
  • D. All concentrations give the same enzymatic activity.

Explanation

The correct answer is that catalase activity increases with substrate concentration up to a point. This conclusion is supported by the observation that more bubbles formed at higher hydrogen peroxide concentrations, indicating increased catalase activity. The other options are incorrect because they either misinterpret the relationship between catalase and hydrogen peroxide (inhibition or lack of effect) or suggest that all concentrations give the same enzymatic activity, which contradicts the experimental results.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? support@testustad.com

About Scientific Reasoning

Scientific reasoning evaluates hypotheses through observations, variables, controls, measurements and experimental results. Questions involve identifying independent and dependent variables, recognising a fair test, interpreting tables or graphs, distinguishing evidence from opinion, and deciding whether data supports, rejects or leaves a hypothesis unresolved.

Practise Scientific Reasoning

334 free Scientific Reasoning MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Scientific Reasoning questions

Experiment: A lab tested the impact of smoking on lung cilia by exposing cultured airway cells to cigarette smoke daily for a week.Observation: Smoke-exposed cells showed reduced cilia movement and structural damage.Question: What does this experiment show?

Experiment: Plants of the same species were grown in soils containing different heavy metals (lead, mercury, arsenic). Root growth and leaf color were recorded after 2 weeks.Observation: Plants in lead and mercury had stunted roots and yellowing leaves; those in arsenic barely grew.Question: What is the most reasonable conclusion?

Experiment: To test osmoregulation, fish were moved from freshwater to brackish water and monitored for weight change.Observation: Fish initially lost weight but later stabilized.Question: What does this response indicate?

Experiment: To examine cell respiration, two sealed containers were set up: one with germinating seeds, the other with boiled (dead) seeds. CO₂ levels were monitored over 24 hours.Observation: CO₂ increased only in the container with germinating seeds.Question: What does this suggest?

Experiment: Different concentrations of salt solution were added to onion cells under a microscope. Their vacuoles and membranes were observed.Observation: Higher salt concentrations caused vacuole shrinkage and membrane pulling away from the wall.Question: What is the correct interpretation?

Experiment: A comparative study measured heart rate in frogs placed in cold vs. warm water.Observation: Frogs in cold water had slower heart rates than those in warm.Question: What is the conclusion?