Evidence recorded without oath is ________________ in Judicial Proceedings?
Correct answer: C. Not admissible
- A. Admissible
- B. Depends upon circumstances
- C. Not admissible
- D. None of these
Explanation
Evidence recorded without the required oath is generally not admissible in judicial proceedings because the oath forms part of the formal process of recording testimony. This differs from informal statements or material that may be used for a separate evidentiary purpose.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Civil Law
Civil law governs disputes involving private rights, including contracts, property, family relations, torts and compensation. The subject explains breach of duty, civil liability, damages, specific relief, injunctions and other remedies, while distinguishing private claims between individuals from criminal proceedings brought to punish offences against the state.
Practise Civil Law
912 free Civil Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Civil Law questions
Evidence produced through audio cassette is__________________?
A video film is admissible piece of evidence under Article______________, of Qnun-e-Shahadat?
The Limitation Act, 1908 was enacted on_________________?
A Nikah form is_____________ document?
An investigating officer can refresh his memory from his diary as provided in__________________?
The power given to Court under Article 150 Qanun-e-Shahadat is_____________ power of the Court to declare any witness hostile?