Argument: "Smoking should be banned in public places."Which strengthens this?

Correct answer: A. Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers

  • A. Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers
  • B. Smokers enjoy personal freedom
  • C. Smoking is a personal choice
  • D. Smoke is not always visible

Explanation

The correct answer is Option A: Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers. This option strengthens the argument by highlighting the health risks that second-hand smoke poses to non-smokers, thus supporting the need to ban smoking in public areas to protect public health. Option B and Option C focus on personal freedom and choice, which are less relevant to the public health argument. Option D discusses the visibility of smoke, which does not address its health impact.

Written and checked by , MS Computer ScienceLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Critical Thinking

Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.

Practise Critical Thinking

435 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this

Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 27 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Critical Thinking questions