Argument: "Smoking should be banned in public places."Which strengthens this?
Correct answer: A. Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers
- A. Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers
- B. Smokers enjoy personal freedom
- C. Smoking is a personal choice
- D. Smoke is not always visible
Explanation
The correct answer is Option A: Second-hand smoke harms non-smokers. This option strengthens the argument by highlighting the health risks that second-hand smoke poses to non-smokers, thus supporting the need to ban smoking in public areas to protect public health. Option B and Option C focus on personal freedom and choice, which are less relevant to the public health argument. Option D discusses the visibility of smoke, which does not address its health impact.
Last updated
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking examines how conclusions follow from evidence, including claims, assumptions, arguments, inferences and relevant facts. Questions ask you to identify hidden assumptions, distinguish strong from weak evidence, assess cause and effect, recognise common reasoning errors, and decide which statement strengthens or weakens an argument.
Practise Critical Thinking
361 free Critical Thinking MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
2 look at this series 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 12. Which number you think will be next?
A bar chart shows a 40% rise in online purchases over two years. A reasonable conclusion is:
A book cannot exist without
A city increased its public transport budget by 30%. A valid assumption is:
A company claimed 99% customer satisfaction. What would a critical thinker question first?