All children are silly people. Some silly people are rich people. All rich people are big shots. Which of the following conclusions are NECESSARILY TRUE?CONCLUSIONS:I. Some silly people are children.II. Some rich people are children.III. Some silly people are big shots.
Correct answer: A. I and III
- A. I and III
- B. II
- C. II and III
- D. I and II
Explanation
Let's analyze each conclusion one by one: I. "Some silly people are children." This conclusion is necessarily true based on the given statements. While it's mentioned that "All children are silly people," it implies that there are some silly people who are children. It's possible that there are other silly people who are not children. II. "Some rich people are children." This conclusion is not necessarily true based on the given statements. Although it's mentioned that "Some silly people are rich people" and "All children are silly people," it doesn't necessarily mean that there are rich people who are children. There could be rich people who are not children. III. "Some silly people are big shots." This conclusion is necessarily true based on the given statements. It's stated that "Some silly people are rich people" and "All rich people are big shots." Therefore, it's logically consistent that there must be some silly people who are big shots. So, the correct conclusion is: A. I and III I and III are necessarily true based on the given statements, while II is not necessarily true.
Last updated
About Syllogisms
Syllogisms use categorical statements such as all, some and no to establish relationships between groups. Questions require checking whether conclusions necessarily follow from the premises, often by mental set relationships or Venn diagrams, and distinguishing valid deductions from conclusions that are merely possible.
Practise Syllogisms
40 free Syllogisms MCQs from Analytical and Logical Reasoning, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Analytical and Logical Reasoning questions like this
Analytical and Logical Reasoning is on 24 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
All daffodils are plants. All plants are living things. Some living things are real. Conclusions: I. All daffodils are living things. II. Some living things are flowers. III. All daffodils are real. Which conclusions follow?
All hammers are tools. Some tools are useless things. All useless things are trash. Which of the following is NECESSARILY TRUE given only the information above?ConclusionsI. Some hammers are trash. II. Some tools are trash.III. All useless things are tools.
If all surgeons are doctors and some doctors are researchers, which conclusion definitely follows?
In syllogistic reasoning, a conclusion containing the word all can follow only if
Some bags are pouches. All pouches are cases. No cases are purses. Which of the following conclusions are NECESSARILY TRUE?CONCLUSIONS:I. Some pouches are purses.II. Some bags are cases.III. No bags are purses.