According to Hohfeld's analysis, what is the correlativity of a legal right?
Correct answer: C. A legal duty imposed on another person
- A. A legal disability imposed on the right-holder
- B. A legal privilege held by the same person
- C. A legal duty imposed on another person
- D. A legal immunity held by the opposing party
Explanation
In Hohfeld's scheme, a right in the strict sense correlates with another person's duty. A privilege correlates with a no-right, while immunity correlates with a disability, so these alternatives confuse separate Hohfeldian relationships.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence examines the nature, purpose and sources of law through the ideas of justice, rights, duties, sovereignty, liability and legal personality. It compares natural law, analytical positivism, historical, sociological and realist approaches, and considers how courts interpret legal rules, distinguish law from morality and resolve conflicts between competing principles.
Practise Jurisprudence
70 free Jurisprudence MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Jurisprudence questions
What proposition is most characteristic of legal realism?
In judicial reasoning, what is ratio decidendi?
What does Roscoe Pound mean by describing law as social engineering?
Which statement best reflects the positivist approach to the validity of law?
What historical development did Henry Maine identify in the movement from ancient to modern legal systems?
What did Eugen Ehrlich mean by the expression "living law"?