A single, memorable case of welfare fraud has a greater impact on estimates of the frequency of welfare abuse than do statistics showing that this case is actually the exception to the rule. This illustrates that judgments are influenced by the:

Correct answer: A. availability heuristic

  • A. availability heuristic
  • B. belief perseverance phenomenon
  • C. framing effect
  • D. confirmation bias

Explanation

The availability heuristic makes memorable or easily recalled examples seem more common than they really are. A vivid fraud case can therefore outweigh representative statistics in a person’s judgment.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

Practise Cognitive Psychology

552 free Cognitive Psychology MCQs from Psychology, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Psychology questions like this

Psychology is on this paper prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for it.

More Cognitive Psychology questions