Why is state-based diplomacy no longer significant?
Correct answer: D. b and c
- A. Because globalization has taken away the focus on the state
- B. Because of the increased amount of non-state actors that are significant in the international stage
- C. It is still significant, since most diplomatic agency is still the preserve of states
- D. b and c
Explanation
State-based diplomacy has not disappeared, but it is no longer the only significant diplomatic channel because NGOs, multinational firms, and other non-state actors influence international affairs. The combination of continuing state importance and growing non-state influence makes d the intended answer.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Diplomacy
75 free Diplomacy MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Diplomacy questions
What are the major functions of the 'diplomatic machine'?
Why did the attacks of September 11, 2001 produce a pessimistic view for diplomacy?
Why are developing states 'handicapped' diplomatically?
What are some challenges to state-based diplomacy?
What was the dramatic focus of diplomatic activity associated with 'East - West' confrontation during the Cold War?
Define diplomacy.