Which statement correctly describes the legal effect of an offence being cognizable under criminal procedure?

Correct answer: C. The police may generally arrest without a warrant

  • A. The accused cannot obtain bail in any circumstances
  • B. The offence must always be tried by a jury
  • C. The police may generally arrest without a warrant
  • D. The offence can be prosecuted only by a private complainant

Explanation

In a cognizable case, the police generally have authority to arrest without a warrant and investigate according to law. Cognizable status does not automatically eliminate the possibility of bail or require a jury trial.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Criminal Law

Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.

Practise Criminal Law

1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this

Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Criminal Law questions