Which statement correctly describes the legal effect of an offence being cognizable under criminal procedure?
Correct answer: A. The police may generally arrest without a warrant
- A. The police may generally arrest without a warrant
- B. The offence must always be tried by a jury
- C. The accused cannot obtain bail in any circumstances
- D. The offence can be prosecuted only by a private complainant
Explanation
In a cognizable case, the police generally have authority to arrest without a warrant and investigate according to law. Cognizable status does not automatically eliminate the possibility of bail or require a jury trial.
Last updated
About Criminal Law
Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.
Practise Criminal Law
60 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
A person commits an offence under Section 411 of the Pakistan Penal Code when the person dishonestly receives or retains property knowing, or having reason to believe, that it is:
A person intends to commit an offence but the chosen method cannot possibly produce the prohibited result. What is the usual criminal-law issue?
A threat constitutes criminal intimidation under the Pakistan Penal Code when it is made with the intention of:
Dishonest misappropriation under the Pakistan Penal Code primarily involves:
For an act to constitute theft under Section 378 of the Pakistan Penal Code, the property must generally be: