What is the usual effect of a strict-liability offence in criminal law?

Correct answer: C. The prosecution need not prove a guilty mind for the prohibited act

  • A. The offence can be tried only after a civil claim is decided
  • B. The accused must prove every element of the alleged offence
  • C. The prosecution need not prove a guilty mind for the prohibited act
  • D. The prosecution must prove a specific motive beyond the prohibited act

Explanation

A strict-liability offence generally imposes liability without requiring proof of mens rea for the relevant act. This does not mean that every criminal offence is strict liability, since most offences require a guilty mental state.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Criminal Law

Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.

Practise Criminal Law

1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this

Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Criminal Law questions