Under the general rule of treaty law, how can a treaty impose an obligation on a third state?
Correct answer: B. Only when the third state expressly accepts that obligation
- A. Whenever two other states notify the third state of the treaty
- B. Only when the third state expressly accepts that obligation
- C. Automatically when the treaty is registered with the United Nations
- D. Whenever the treaty concerns an issue of international importance
Explanation
A treaty does not create obligations for a third state without that state's consent. Treaty registration or the importance of the subject cannot replace the required acceptance.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About International Law
International law regulates relations among states and other recognised international actors through treaties, customary practice and general legal principles. Coverage includes statehood and recognition, jurisdiction, diplomatic relations, state responsibility, territory, use of force, peaceful dispute settlement and the role of the United Nations, while distinguishing public international law from private international law.
Practise International Law
63 free International Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More International Law questions
What does the expression obligations erga omnes describe in international law?
How is a new state admitted to membership of the United Nations?
What is the normal legal position concerning entry by the receiving state's authorities into diplomatic premises?
What is the usual legal effect of a treaty procured by the threat or use of force against a state in violation of the United Nations Charter?
What does the territorial principle of jurisdiction primarily connect to a state's authority?
What is generally required when an internationally wrongful act is continuing?