Under Pakistan Penal Code an aggressor does not entitled to right of___________________?
Correct answer: D. Self defence
- A. None of these
- B. National defence
- C. Public defence
- D. Self defence
Explanation
A person who initiates an unlawful assault cannot ordinarily claim the right of private defence as a justification for that aggression. “Self-defence” is the closest option, although the PPC’s statutory expression is “right of private defence.”
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Criminal Law
Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.
Practise Criminal Law
1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Criminal Law questions
Section 105, P.P.C. deals with___________________?
A instigate B for commission of an offence, such instigation will be called ____________________?
A instigate B to give false evidence. A in consequence of the instigation commits that offence. A is guilty of abetting that offence and is_______________?
Minimum quantum of diyat as provided in section 323 P.P.C. is___________________?
The word "Tazir" is derived from__________________?
The term "Qisas" means_________________?