Ultimately, the literary theory of deconstruction argues that ?
Correct answer: D. All of the above answers are correct.
- A. the meaning of a text always relies on context.
- B. texts are always heterogeneous.
- C. any system for the production of meaning is inevitably bound by context, yet also limitless.
- D. All of the above answers are correct.
Explanation
Deconstruction treats meaning as dependent on context, internally divided, and never finally limited to one stable interpretation. Thus all three statements describe aspects of deconstructive theory.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Literary Criticism
268 free Literary Criticism MCQs from English Literature, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask English Literature questions like this
English Literature is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Literary Criticism questions
In which capter of Biographia Lieraria, Coleridge make a distinction between fancy and imagination ?
Is Dryden's Essay of Dramatic Poesy a work of ?
Who was the first literary critic who said that "Art is twice removed from reality" ?
They believe that this approach tends to reduce art to the level of biography and make it relative (to the times) rather than universal. What approach possess this disadvantage ?
A critic of Thomas Otway's "Venice Preserv'd" wishes to know why the play's conspirators, despite the horrible, bloody details of their obviously brutish plan, are portrayed in a sympathetic light. She examines the author's life and times and discovers that there are obvious similarities between the conspiracy in the play and the Popish Plot. She is most likely a critic ?
He was an influential force in archetypal criticism ?