The question is whether A robbed B went to fair with money in his possession and that showed it or mentioned the fact that he had it to third person are________________?
Correct answer: A. Relevant fact
- A. Relevant fact
- B. Irrelevant fact
- C. Both A and B
- D. None of these
Explanation
Possessing money before the alleged robbery and showing or mentioning it to others may indicate preparation, opportunity, or conduct connected with the alleged offence. Such surrounding facts can therefore be relevant under the law of evidence.
Last updated
About Criminal Law
Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.
Practise Criminal Law
1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
Related questions
(+/-)-4-brome-2, 5 dimethoxy-a-methyphenethylamine is the chemical name of_____________?
5, 5-daily lbarturic acid is chemical name of_______________?
7-Chloro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-iH-5-benzodiazepine-2, 4(3H,5H)-dione is the chemical name of____________?
A, a client says to B, and advocate "I wish to obtain possession of property by use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue". The communication, being made in furtherance of criminal purpose is_____________ disclosure?
A aims at a deer but misses the target and kill, Z who is standing by. A is guilty of____________________?