The question is whether A robbed B went to fair with money in his possession and that showed it or mentioned the fact that he had it to third person are________________?
Correct answer: B. Relevant fact
- A. Irrelevant fact
- B. Relevant fact
- C. Both A and B
- D. None of these
Explanation
Possessing money before the alleged robbery and showing or mentioning it to others may indicate preparation, opportunity, or conduct connected with the alleged offence. Such surrounding facts can therefore be relevant under the law of evidence.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Criminal Law
Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.
Practise Criminal Law
1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Criminal Law questions
Rule of plea of alibi is applicable in______________?
Article________, of the Qanun-e-Shahadat deals with identification Parade ?
The term "identification" means_________________?
Relevancy of fact forming part of________________?
Article 18, of the Qanun-e-Shahadat provided that evidence may be given on facts in issue and________________?
Article 17, of Qanun-e-Shahadat deals with_____________?